|
Ever find yourself with a good (or at least passable) idea for an article,
but without an idea of how to start it? And then when you come up with
an idea for an opening, you realize that this opening would work so much
better on the main page, and using it in both places would be a bit tacky.
Well, that is exactly what has happened to me today. This column is rating
of a few different types of crackers, and while I have a good idea already
of how I am going to rate said crackers and what I'm going to say about
them, I don't have a good opening idea, and I generally do my openings
first, which only makes sense. So without further ado, on with the ratings.
Nabisco Premium Plus: This humble saltine is the
most simple and basic cracker ever to be entirely too popular (Nabisco
says this is the most popular cracker they make), and is what I envision
when someone says "cracker" without any other description. Plain,
dry, and about as exciting as a galvanized pail full of tapwater, these
crackers exist primarily to crumple up and put in soup. They are also
one of the few things that you can safely eat when you have a bad stomach
flu. The thing is that any number of different crackers can be crumbled
into soup, so Premium Plus crackers are hardly necessary. And lets face
it, sick food is Bad.
Breton Wheat Thins: I remember these being called
Breton Champagne crackers, but the Dare website makes no mention of this,
so I'm guessing they dropped the champagne part of the name. The champagne
name brings up connotations of eating these crackers with caviar and white
wine while listening to a Mozart sonata. Maybe they wanted to blue-collar
it up a bit. I don't know why they'd bother, after all the Ritz name brings
up the same images, and Nabisco has done very well with the Ritz brand.
Name aside, these are great crackers. Light and tasty and large, they
have enough flavour to snack on without any toppings, which is something
that can't be said for a lot of cracker varieties. Breton Wheat Thins
are Good.
Melba Toast: Possibly the driest thing ever to be
sold as a food product, Melba toast are actually not half bad when you
cover 'em with peanut butter or cheese spread. Plus these are on the big
side, so you can use a lot of your favourite spread. Also, stack a few
up and you'll notice that they start to resemble a little loaf of bread,
which is kinda cool. But the best thing about melba toast is the way they
expand when you crumble them into your soup, they rehydrate and double
in size, so these are ideal for adding some texture to a watery soup,
which is a Good thing.
Triscuits: These are perhaps the most complicated
cracker I've encountered, which illustrates the whole problem with them.
Triscuits are like a guy who really wants to fit in with the group and
therefore tries way too hard to make everyone like him, but only ends
up in becoming too annoying to deal with in anything more than a small
dose. Everyone knows someone like that, and if you don't, I have bad news
for you. . . But I digress. Triscuits have too much going on to be taken
seriously. They are heavy for a small cracker, their texture is more over
done than a Britney Spears music video, and the flavour gets old well,
about as fast as a Britney Spears music video. After you've munched down
half a dozen you start to ask "Why did I buy these anyway?"
Thing is, you'll buy them again six months later. How Ugly is that?
Cheese Nips: While Cheese Nips are certainly
very flavourful, I am left with a bad taste in my mouth because of the
name. For those of you that are too naive or young to know, "Nips"
is a derogatory term for Japanese that was used during the second world
war, deriving from the fact that the Japanese name for Japan is Nippon.
Perhaps not the most insulting racial slur out there, but that hardly
makes it right. While these might be the tastiest racist snack food on
the market, it still leaves them firmly in the Ugly column.
|