|
A week has passed since the twin towers of the World Trade
Center were destroyed by terrorists. The death toll has crept up, and
although final numbers are probably still weeks away, it appears that
more than 5000 people died in the attacks. For those that were not directly
touched by these events, life is starting to get back to some semblance
of normalcy. At least, for those that don't work in skyscrapers. Or at
airports.
As of this writing there has been no strike against the
terrorists, but it will surely come soon enough. The level of rhetoric
and anger is rising all around, and unless the Taliban decides to hand
over Osama bin Laden on a silver platter, it's only a matter of time until
the shooting begins and the bombs start falling. Just where the bombs
will land remains the question of the day.
Everything I've said above you already know, unless you've
been living in a cave somewhere other than Afghanistan. I felt the need
to summarize before getting into this rant, the topic of which is "what's
going to happen now?" I don't know what will happen any more than
you do. I'm not Nostradamus, which is a good thing, because it would be
hard to write rants in quatrains. What I do have is a suspicion about
what I expect will happen. I'm putting this down to virtual paper now,
and we'll see how close I come to being right.
First, I don't see Afghanistan handing Osama bin Laden over
to anyone, not without a fight. The Afghans are a tough people, they fought
the Russians for a decade and won (albeit with lots of support from the
rest of the Islamic world and the CIA). They fought the British when India
and Pakistan were colonies, and won then as well. The country is rugged
and unwelcome to invaders, and the people aren't afraid of a fight. Granted,
the Russians and the Brits didn't have anything comparable to the resources
and technology the US is able to bring to the fray, but this isn't going
to be the turkey shoot that Desert Storm was.
Second, a full scale ground invasion of Afghanistan is highly
unlikely. The last thing the US wants to get involved with is a second
Vietnam war, and considering that supply lines to Afghanistan have to
run though a neighbouring country, most likely Pakistan, sustaining a
war requires maintaining the favour of Pakistan. Also, Afghanistan has
little or no value to the rest of the world, quite unlike the oil wells
of Kuwait. Afghanistan isn't worth invading to root out terrorist elements.
What will happen instead is air strikes and special forces squads moving
in to eliminate bin Laden's camps. Small, mobile, and deadly is how you
get at this people. Strike fast, level the camps, kill anything that moves.
It's unpleasant and unpalatable, and you won't be seeing footage of it
on CNN.
Third, the illustration of the "war on terrorism"
being similar to the "war on drugs" has been bandied about in
the media already, and I feel this isn't a bad comparison. After all,
the war on drugs isn't a war against any specific state or region, it's
a war on individuals. It's not a traditional war where there are armies
and battle lines. The US didn't invade Columbia to stop the flow of cocaine.
The war on drugs so far has met with many failures. It's
hard to fight a war against a foe that you often can't isolate or identify.
Does this bode ill for the war on terrorism? Not necessarily. The thing
is, there are billions of dollars to be made in moving narcotics. As long
as there is a demand for drugs, there will be a supply. It's basic economics.
Cutting off the supply is all but impossible. But how much money is there
in terrorism? None. There is no profit to be made in blowing up buildings.
It doesn't make economic sense. Sure, this doesn't deter the hard-core
fanatics who are willing to be suicide bombers, but there's not much to
be done to discourage anyone that devoted to a cause. However, I suspect
that there are only so many people actually willing to do this. There
will always be a few, but they are only a small group of marginalized
people. When there's no money involved, and when the US government is
actively hunting down terrorists, the prospect of becoming involved is
a lot less palatable. It's ironic that one of the basic human vices —
greed — will deter people from this particular evil. There is no
money in terrorism. And that's why we can beat it.
|